Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Letter to the Editor/Op Ed: Term limits still needed for Congress

 

Written by: John Warren, Chair, US Term Limits
April 7, 2025

Career politicians. We hear the term every election cycle over and over – in our mailboxes, on our televisions, and on our phones.

 Candidates running for office have a good reason for repeating the phrase when describing their opponents who have served in elected offices for years: voters are sick and tired of career politicians. You know the types: they run for state Senate, then Congress, and on it goes. The cycle never ends and they fail to deliver for the American people.

And the best example of failure is the group of politicians sitting in Congress. Year after year, no matter which party is in charge, Congress fails to pass a budget, fails to cut spending, fails to invest in real national defense, fails to counter the threat of China. Congress simply fails to work for the American people.

 It’s no surprise that the president is left with no choice but to take action by executive order – even congressional leaders of the president’s party can’t seem to actually cut wasteful spending. In fact, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has been the sponsor of many of the very projects that have sent our nation spiraling into devastating national debt. Gender programs in Pakistan? Lindsey Graham made sure that was in the budget. It’s irresponsible and breaches a fiduciary responsibility to American taxpayers.

 That’s why now, more than ever, we need congressional term limits.

 February 2025 commemorated the 74th anniversary of the adoption of the 22nd Amendment that limited a president to two terms in office. George Washington set the standard that a president served no more than two terms. Although several presidents had attempted to seek a third term, none succeeded until Franklin Roosevelt in 1940, as the nation confronted the possibility of entering World War II.

 But it wasn’t until 1947 that Congress passed the legislation that would create the 22nd Amendment and the state ratification process began. South Carolina was the 38th state to ratify the Amendment on March 13, 1951.

 The anniversary of this amendment highlights the importance of today’s most popular and bipartisan issue – congressional term limits. A recent RMG Research poll showed 83% of Americans regardless of political affiliation support congressional term limits. That is a remarkable show of support that members of Congress would do well to recognize.

 With more than 151 members who have pledged to support congressional term limits now serving in Congress, we are seeing movement to pass congressional term limits. Once passed by Congress and ratified by the states, it would limit representatives to three terms, or six years, and senators to two terms, or 12 years.

 Because politicians in Congress are unlikely to limit themselves, it’s time for states to take action by calling for a convention to adopt a congressional term limits amendment. When enough states request a convention to add a congressional term limits amendment to the constitution, Congress is bypassed and the amendment can be proposed by the states for ratification. The convention would be strictly limited to imposing term limits on Congress.

 A growing roster of states has called for a limited convention to propose a congressional term limits amendment to the constitution. In South Carolina, House Joint Resolution 3008 calls for a congressional term limits amendment. It is essential the Palmetto State pass this resolution and go on record for congressional term limits.

 Term limits represent an opportunity for the people to retake control of Congress, kick out the special interests, and force the career politicians to job outside of government. The people deserve real representation in Congress, not more of the same.

**********
About the Author:

Greenville businessman John Warren is the state chair for U.S. Term Limits and is a former republican candidate for South Carolina Governor.

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com

Monday, April 7, 2025

SC Senate vs SC Treasurer Curtis Loftis in latest Columbia swamp fight that’s lasted more than a decade



South Carolina Treasurer, Curtis Loftis, finds himself in a Columbia, S.C. swamp fight with South Carolina senators who say they want to remove Loftis from office for “willfully neglected duties” stemming from a $1.8 billion accounting error, which only existed on paper and does not involve actual money.


The senate and the Columbia swamp are playing political games and trying to ruin a good man, but this is not new. This is a swamp fight that has been going on for nearly a decade. They’ve never liked Loftis. They’ve wanted to oust him since he blew the whistle in 2013 on the mismanagement of the State pension.

Do you remember when the SC Investment Commission cost the state $7billion on bad investments and the swamp in Columbia, then tried to go after Loftis? Palmetto Examiner remembers.

We also remember when Loftis disclosed that the investment commission was paying hundreds of millions per year in hidden fees to their special interest Wall Street friends. The Senate finance committee has been after him since.

They’ll go after anyone that will not bow to them. It’s why they want to take control of the elected office to be able to appoint their own swamp creature.

The office of the treasury belongs to the people of South Carolina. They should always deicide at the ballot box who is in it, not power-hungry power broker swamp creatures in Columbia by appointment. 

Op Ed Guest Columnist: Leaders in Columbia Shouldn’t Let Bad Actors Pass the Buck to Others; Protect Our Children from Inappropriate Online Content


Written by: Tracy Robins, Richland County
April 1, 2025


Throughout 2024, numerous reports exposed the secretive tactics used by social media giants like Facebook and TikTok to profit from children. This includes shady data collection practices, targeted advertising to minors, and algorithms designed to serve dangerous and addictive content to children. These reports have sparked an outcry among parents, including families here in South Carolina, for our elected officials to do something to stop bad actors from exploiting children and teenagers online.

In response to these growing concerns, lawmakers around the country have fought to rein in dangerous social media companies. This includes Governor McMaster’s decision to ban TikTok on state government devices. Additionally, Attorney General Alan Wilson has joined dozens of state attorneys general to sue Facebook for intentionally harming its young users. In the past, TikTok and Facebook have fought fiercely against regulations and lawsuits like these. However, it’s become impossible for social media companies to deny the harmful effects of their platforms.

Now, in the face of mounting pressure, Facebook has changed its tune, and the company claims it wants elected officials to pass social media regulations, but as always, the devil is in the details.

Facebook’s plan is to get lawmakers to regulate other companies so that social media platforms like TikTok and Facebook aren’t held responsible for intentionally designing addictive and harmful apps. Of course, there are some serious issues with Facebook’s plans. The Supreme Court has already overturned similar proposals, meaning taxpayer dollars will be spent defending Facebook-backed legislation instead of protecting our children. What’s worse is that the regulations Facebook supports wouldn’t even work. They include loopholes that would allow children to continue to access their platforms and would even force other businesses to hand private data over to social media companies, making it easier for bad actors like Facebook and TikTok to profit off their users’ sensitive information.

Facebook’s proposal has earned the support of other companies with a track record of unsavory business practices who have realized they could benefit by passing off the responsibility for their own problems. Match Group, for example, which owns many of the largest data apps on the market like Hinge and Tinder, has thrown its support behind the measure. Match, of course, sees the bill as a ticket to make someone else accountable for keeping underage users off of its apps, an issue the company has failed to address for years.

Pornography websites have even realized that these kinds of bills could benefit them. Companies that produce and promote explicit content have indicated their support for similar so-called “device filter” legislation that includes loopholes that would allow them to show inappropriate content to underage children and teens on their laptops, desktops, and some other devices without facing any accountability. 

However, lawmakers should not listen to social media giants, dating apps, or pornography companies about which online regulations will best protect young South Carolinians. Instead, they should listen to the parents of children who are affected by dangerous content online. New polling shows that 87% of parents support regulations to safeguard children’s mental health and shield them from inappropriate content online. The same study found that 93% of parents want content providers, including social media companies, video game makers, and pornography websites, to play a role in protecting kids from dangerous content on the internet.

In other words, parents know that the best way to keep children safe online is to hold actors accountable, and they’re right. Companies like Facebook have responded to recent pressure from lawmakers to make the apps they own safer. In fact, the company recently adopted technology to verify users’ ages and keep children away from Instagram, which is owned by Facebook. In Columbia, state legislators should do the same and put pressure on Facebook and other bad actors to take similar actions that would keep young users off of their dangerous apps.

The fact is that dangerous apps are harmful to our children, and for far too long, these bad actors have avoided accountability for their actions. Lawmakers shouldn’t let them avoid responsibility again by falling for a transparent effort to put the onus on others.

**********

About the Author:

Tracy Robins lives in Columbia and is a retired public-school teacher. She currently serves as the Richland County Republican Party’s Election Committee Chairwoman.


What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com



Anderson County Robotics team wins state championship, headed to World Championship

 


Teenagers are usually getting criticized in the media for doing all sorts of bad things, like bullying, fighting or doing drugs, etc., but these teenagers from Anderson County are doing great things and we should applaud them!

Anderson County Library’s Teen Vex Robotics Team has won the state championship and are headed to the World Championships in Dallas this May.

The four-student team, Isabel Feldkamp, Cara Griesemere, Sam Smith, and Banks Criswell, applied coding techniques, robot design and engineering journal principles to win the S.C. Vex Robotics Championships earlier this year.

Team Coach Dr. Wanda Staggers, Anderson Institute of Technology, and Library Services Teen Director Rachel Da Silva have worked with the students and are helping them prepare and raise funds for the big event.

Congratulations to these teenagers doing great things! When I was a teenager, well, never mind… We’ll just say finding trouble and playing sports were my major accomplishments. They are making much better decisions and are way smarter than I’ll ever be. Keep up the great work kids!  

**********

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com


News and Views from Around the State: April 7, 2025

Good news for South Carolinians who wait and then panic to get their taxes filed at the last minute. (Guilty) You have an extra two weeks to procrastinate. The IRS and the SC Department of Revenue have extendedthe April 15 deadline to May 1 due to Hurricane Helene.


Speaking of taxes, S.C. House Republicans have put the brakes on an income tax proposal that would have implemented a 3.9% flat tax rate across the board after public outrage. 

Dorchester County man says his teenage son committed suicide because of bullying and says schools need to do more to protect students from bullying.

The fight for changes to South Carolina’s liquor liability laws to provide much needed relief to restaurants and establishments from surging liquor liability insurance premiums that have put many out of business continues. A new organization of hospitality leaders with lobbyists and lawyers enters the fight, Responsible Hospitality Reform Alliance.

Six months after Helene, boats litter Beaufort shore, but who will end up with the responsibility of cleaning it up? There’s a debate coming soon and it could be taken up by the SC legislature. When private property becomes a public nuisance on someone else’s private property who’s at fault? Who pays to fix it? A debate is coming that it should be the taxpayer. I say no. Absolutely not!



A wild day in South Carolina history during the Cold War. March 11, 1958, the US Airforce accidently dropped a Mark 6 nuke in rural Florence County. James Bessinger explains. You should subscribe to his Substack, The Carolina Courier.

**********

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com

Friday, April 4, 2025

Gov. McMaster doubles-down on Simmer Nomination to lead SC Dept. of Public Health; Asks Senate for full floor vote after contentious confirmation hearing, 12-5 vote not to confirm

 

Sen. Matt Leber, R-Charleston, (Right) asks Dr. Edward Simmer questions during his Senate
confirmation hearing Thursday. The Senate Medical Affairs Committee voted 12-5 not to confirm.

Written by Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner
April 4, 2025

The Senate Medical Affairs Committee voted 12-5 against the confirmation of Dr. Edward Simmer, the governor’s pick, to run the S.C. Department of Public Health yesterday after a contentious hearing that centered around decisions made during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The second day of Simmer’s confirmation hearing drew a large crowd not in support of his nomination, and Sen. Danny Verdin, R-Laurens, Committee Chairman, had to call for decorum twice before warning the audience he would clear the room.  

The no vote puts Simmer’s nomination on pause in committee indefinitely, but it doesn’t automatically kill the nomination. The full Senate could still decide to take up his confirmation with a vote on the floor, which Gov. Henry McMaster, who seems to be doubling down on Simmer, is strongly encouraging them to do.

“I remain resolute in my support of Dr. Simmer and am hopeful that the full senate will see through the falsehoods and mistruths being spread about his service to our state and nation,” McMaster said in a statement on social media soon after the committee’s vote.

If the Senate does decide to give McMaster his wish of a full vote on the Senate floor for confirmation, the odds seemed to be stacked against Simmer with a Republican supermajority. Sen. Tom Davis, R-Beaufort, was the only one of the 13 Republicans on the committee who voted in favor of his confirmation yesterday.

“There’s just no way I can sugar coat it,” said Sen. Harvey Peeler, R-Gaffney. “I’m not telling you something you don’t already know. Your confirmation is facing an uphill battle.”

Simmer was drilled by Republicans on his response, quotes and decisions made during the COVID-19 pandemic, and admitted himself he would have made some decisions differently with the information he has today.

“Knowing what I know today, yes, I would have approached that differently,” Simmer said speaking about recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for young people. “I would not have encouraged the vaccine as strongly.”

Simmer mentioned throughout the hearing him and his office “worked with the information they had at the time.”

One Senator told Simmer we had the best information you can have at any time during an emergency.

“What I’ve heard from yourself, it’s not a critique, but also from many other people who made many mistakes during COVID. They’re all saying the same thing now. We didn’t have all the information,” said Sen. Tom Fernadez, R-Berkley. “Here’s what we did have. We had the United States Constitution. We had personal liberty. We had personal freedom. That’s the best information at any time in any emergency.”

Sen. Matt Leber, R-Charleston, also hit Simmer hard during question stating he has lost confidence in Simmer’s leadership.

“I’m not confident,” Leber said. “I think about the sheriff’s and the teachers and nurses in Charleston County that lost their job because they were told you take the vaccine or your out.”

Simmer said he didn’t agree with that and didn’t think that was a good idea, but when Leber asked, “Did you speak up?” Simmer replied he didn’t because he didn’t think it was his place to speak up.

“I’m asking you to speak up as our expert on health,” Leber said. “Did you speak up as our South Carolina expert on health on something you fully admit that you felt was unnecessary or good for society?”

Simmer released a statement after the hearing thanking the members of the committee and especially Chairman Sen. Denny Verdin for providing him the opportunity to answer, “any and all questions about my nomination in an honorable and respectable format.”

“I also appreciate the continued support of Gov. Henry McMaster for my leadership of the S.C. Department of Public Health,” Simmer noted.

Simmer will remain as the interim director for now.


**********
About the Author:

Tony Spain writes for his own website, Palmetto Examiner. He is a former candidate for Richland County Council 2020 and an award winning former military photographer and journalist while in the Public Affairs Office for the U.S. Army. His photos and writing have been published in numerous publications such as The Commercial News, Danville, Ill.; The Paraglide, Fort Bragg, N.C.; Soldier of Fortune Magazine; The State Newspaper, Columbia, S.C., and more. He currently writes for his own website, Palmetto Examiner

He lives in Columbia, S.C.

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com


Tuesday, April 1, 2025

South Carolina Legislature Proposes Bill to Shield Gun Owners from Financial Tracking

Photo by Stephen Andrews

 
Written by Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner
April 1, 2025

COLUMBIA, SC – (PE) A bill aimed to protect the financial privacy of gun owners is gaining momentum in the South Carolina House, targeting credit card companies to stop them from using specific merchant category codes (MCCs) to track firearm and ammunition purchases in the Palmetto State.

The "Second Amendment Financial Privacy Act" (House Bill 3930), the legislation passed unanimously through a House Judiciary subcommittee last week and is now headed to the full House Judiciary Committee for further debate.

Introduced by Rep. Bobby Cox (R-Greer), a former Army Ranger, Iraq War veteran and strong Second Amendment advocate, the bill responds to growing concerns among gun rights supporters about potential "financial surveillance."

“South Carolinians shouldn’t have to worry about their constitutional rights being tracked by their credit card statements,” Cox said during a recent hearing. “The bill ensures that law-abiding citizens can exercise their freedoms without fear of a backdoor registry.”

Protective legislation similar to South Carolina’s proposal started to be introduced around the nation after the International Organization for Standardization, an international nongovernmental group based in Switzerland that creates international business standards, approved in September 2022 the creation of unique MCC for stores that sell guns and ammunition, a move that some fear could enable banks or even the government to monitor lawful gun buyers.

The legislation prohibits financial institutions operating in South Carolina from assigning MCCs that distinguish firearm retailers from other merchants. It also empowers the state Attorney General to investigate violations, with fines of up to $1,000 per instance after a 30-day warning period.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, a vocal supporter, testified that such codes represent a "slippery slope" toward profiling gun owners, reinforcing the bill’s urgency.

Wilson was among 24 attorneys general nationwide who signed a letter to heads of American Express, Mastercard and Visa less than two weeks after the international group approved codes for gun stores that states the codes would “not protect safety” and unfairly singles out law-abiding merchants and consumers.”

“Purposely tracking this information can only result in its misuse, either unintentional or deliberate. Creating and tracking this data only matters if your institutions are considering using that information to take further, harmful action-like infringing upon consumer privacy, inhibiting constitutionally protected purchases by selectively restricting the use of your payment systems, or otherwise withholding your financial services from targeted ‘disfavored’ merchants,” the letter reads. “And generating a ‘list of gun buyers’ creates the obvious risk that law-abiding consumer’s information will be leaked, discovered, hacked, or otherwise obtained and misused by those who oppose Americans exercising their Second Amendment rights.”

Opposition to the bill has been minimal in South Carolina with most critics coming from national gun control advocacy groups such as Everytown for Gun Safety, who argue that MCCs is a safety measure that could help reduce mass killings and help detect illegal gun purchases, citing cases where transaction data aided investigations into mass shootings.

The killers in mass shootings such as the July 2012 Aurora, Colorado, movie theater; the June 2016 Orlando nightclub; and the 2017 Las Vegas music festival all bought thousands of dollars’ worth of guns ahead of the massacres, according to a report by The New York Times.

Banks in South Carolina have not and are currently not implementing MCCs and major card companies like Visa and Mastercard have paused a broader rollout making the South Carolina Bankers Association question the bill’s necessity.

"We do feel fairly confident that at least banks are not doing this in the state, or really anywhere right now, and right now, the card networks aren’t," said Neil Rashley, Senior Vice President, SCBA, suggesting the legislation might impose unneeded regulations.

 But supporters of the bill argue the measure is a proactive defense against future overreach.

"Even if banks aren’t using these codes now, we need to stop it before it starts," a spokesperson for the National Rifle Association said. The NRA has endorsed similar laws in 19 other states.

A nationwide ban on the tracking of gun purchases has been introduced in the U.S. House. One of the bills 95 co-sponsors includes South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson (R) SC-2.

California adopted legislation in September 2023 with opposite language where credit card companies are required to track firearm purchases. Colorado and New York followed. The codes must be assigned to gun stores in those states by May 1.

Legislators in North Carolina are considering a similar law.

******************************************************************************


About the Author:



Tony Spain writes for his own website, Palmetto Examiner. He is a former candidate for Richland County Council 2020 and an award winning former military photographer and journalist while in the Public Affairs Office for the U.S. Army. His photos and writing have been published in numerous publications such as The Commercial News, Danville, Ill.; The Paraglide, Fort Bragg, N.C.; Soldier of Fortune Magazine; The State Newspaper, Columbia, S.C., and more. He currently writes for his own website, Palmetto Examiner

He lives in Columbia, S.C.

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com

Born Slave, Union War Hero, Founder of the SC Republican Party, Congressman: The Robert Smalls Story

Written by Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner February 18, 2026 Robert Smalls was a warrior, but not by sword or rifle on an open battlefield,...