Showing posts with label Gov. Henry McMaster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gov. Henry McMaster. Show all posts

Thursday, January 29, 2026

State House: Chips are off the table for South Carolina Casino


Written by Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner
January 29, 2026


The odds of South Carolina allowing casino gambling just got worse as House members sent a bill that would have allowed for the state’s first casino to be built back to the House Ways and Means Committee, essentially taking the chips off the table before it could get a vote on the House floor.

The odds of the South Carolina legislature allowing the state to build its first Casino were a real long shot even if the House had passed it with the State Senate leadership showing little interest in it and Gov. Henry McMaster an opponent to allow gambling outside of the state lottery.

“I’ve always opposed gambling as a means to raise revenue like this, starting back with Caroll Campbell, when we really got moving on a lot of things, that’s been the state’s position all along,” McMaster said while speaking to reporters recently. “ I think the majority of the people in the state do not want casino gambling, and I don’t either.”

Earlier this year, Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey, R-Edgefield, said he didn’t think the bill would move in the Senate.

“There’s been considerable opposition to gambling in the Senate for a number of years, Massey said. “We’ve had considerable opposition over here even to wagering on horse racing.”

The bill has been lobbied for by a developer who has wanted to build a casino for several years in Orangeburg County along Interstate 95 near Lake Marion. It is estimated the casino and resort would generate $100 million in tax revenue for the state.


**********

About the Author: Tony Spain is a former candidate for Richland County Council 2020 and an award winning former military photographer and journalist while in the Public Affairs Office for the U.S. Army. His photos and writing have been published in numerous publications such as The Commercial News, Danville, Ill.; The Paraglide, Fort Bragg, N.C.; Soldier of Fortune Magazine; The State Newspaper, Columbia, S.C., FITSNews and more.

He lives in Columbia, S.C.

 **********

 What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com

Monday, June 2, 2025

News and Views from Around the State: June 2, 2025

"Catfish wrasslin'," more commonly known as noodling,
is a unique way of fishing for catfish by hand, typically 
done during their spawning season. Noodlers insert their hands 
into catfish burrows, often under logs or rocks, and attempt 
to "wrestle" the fish out. It's a risky activity, as catfish will 
defend their nests by biting, and other animals like alligators
can inhabit the areas. (Photo credit: Philip Gentry)

SC POLITICS: DID SC LAWMAKERS VIOLATE CONSTITUTION BY VOTING THEMSELVES A PAY RAISE? The South Carolina Constitution, Article III, Section 19, suggests that is the case.  “No General Assembly shall have the power to increase the per diem of its own members.” FITSNEWS reports Former Democrat Sen. Dick Harpoolitan is considering a lawsuit if Gov. Henry McMaster doesn’t veto the raise.

SOUTH CAROLINA: CRIME: JUDICIAL: WHEN AND WHY IS THE DEATH PENALTY SOUGHT IN SOUTH CAROLINA:
15 death sentences have been handed down in South Carolina since 2005. How is it determined which cases seek the death penalty in the state.  

GREENVILLE: EDUCATION: Greenville Technical College ranked among the top ten community colleges in the nation by Newsweek.

AIKEN COUNTY: SAVANAH RIVER SITE CELEBRATES 75 YEARS:  Savanah River Plant, now called the Savanah River Site started in 1950 at the request of President Harry Truman to support American nuclear weapons program during the Cold War. Seventy-five years later, South Carolina recognizes the positive impacts SRS has made and continues to make on behalf of American national security and families, US Congressman Joe Wilson writes in an op-ed.

HORRY COUNTY: CRIME: 11 INJURED IN MEMORIAL DAY SHOOTING IN LITTLE RIVER: Ten people suffered gunshot wounds during an altercation on a charter boat during a Memorial Day weekend private party in Little River. One other person suffered an “unknown non-gunfire related” injury, Horry County Police Department said.

SC POLITICS: GOVERNORS RACE: Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, and potential candidate for Governor in 2026 told Aiken Republican Club members she supports a system where judges would be nominated by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. She also told the group as “an accountant by trade” she is a fan of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.

AIKEN COUNTY: EDUCATION: PROPERTY TAXES: Aiken County Board of Education approved a budget increase of $26.1 million by a vote of 7-1. That’s 9.88% higher than last year’s budget. The board also increased the millage rate on property taxes for the first time in more than a decade. Here’s what’s in the budget and how the millage rate increase affects property taxes.

WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY: RULES FOR THEE NOT FOR ME: This is a county car, and I am a county employee. A county employee told a citizen that she could park wherever she wanted when confronted about using a handicap spot at the Williamsburg County Public Service Administration Building.  

SPORTS: COLLEGE BASEBALL: COASTAL CAROLINA ADVANCES TO FOURTH NCAA SUPER REGIONAL: A sacrifice fly by senior outfielder Sebastian Alexander in the bottom of the eighth inning was the only and winning run of the championship game Sunday night, as the Chanticleers defeated East Carolina 1-0 to win the Conway Regional. It’s the fourth time the Chanticleers is headed to the NCAA Super Regional and the first since their 2016 National Championship.

SPORTS: COLLEGE BASEBALL: CLEMSON GETS BLOWN OUT AND ELIMINATED FROM OWN REGIONAL TO END SEASON: Clemson hosted a regional only to be blown out 16-4 by Kentucky and eliminated from the NCAA tournament.

FOOD AND BEVERAGE: THE HISTORY OF FROZEN PIZZA THAT WAS ALMOST A NOTHING BURGER: Nearly one million Americans will eat a slice of frozen pizza today and never know that the lucrative industry was almost a flop. In fact, pizza as a whole was an exotic food brought to America by Italian immigrants at the turn of the 20th century and never took off until American GIs returning from Italy after WWII craved it. J. Mark Powell explains more in Holy Cow! History.

OUTDOORSMEN: WRASSLIN’ CATFISH:
It’s more commonly referred to as noodling, a unique late spring outdoorsmen sport that certainly has its followers, but not much of a mainstream appeal. My grandpa used to do it… You know, when men were men or.. uh.. whatever.

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Palmetto State Boat Owners Seek Tax Relief before Legislative Session Ends

South Carolina has the highest boat taxes in the nation. Boat owners
look to the state legislature for tax relief before the legislative
session ends May 8. (Photo Credit: Stephen Andrews, Pexels)
 
Written by: Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner
April 30, 2025

COLUMBIA, S.C. (PE)--South Carolina ranks second in the nation in boat ownership per capita, that’s not surprising from a state that likes to brag about its beautiful waterways, from the beaches to the streams and lakes, they’re hard to beat. What is not hard to beat is the property taxes on boats to enjoy those waterways.

Boat owners in South Carolina are charged some of the highest property taxes in America, more than 320% higher than bordering neighbors. A $50,000 boat is taxed at $2,800 a year in some parts of South Carolina, while the same boat across the lake in North Carolina is taxed at $378.

This has garnered bipartisan support within the South Carolina legislature, aiming to address the tax burden affecting boat owners in the Palmetto State. The House and the Senate introduced similar bills earlier this session, H.3858 and S. 317, which seek to cut property taxes on boats in the state in half. Additionally, the House bill seeks to eliminate the requirement for outboard engine titles.

The House bill gained momentum last week advancing unanimously through the House Ways & Means committee with 50 legislators adding their names to co-sponsor the bill introduced by Rep. Gary Brewer, R-Charleston.

“This is a tax cut for working South Carolinians. The current system punishes families who want to enjoy our lakes, rivers and coastlines. H. 3858 corrects that injustice by lowering taxes and ending outdated taxation on boat motors,” said Brewer. “For too long, high property taxes and burdensome titling requirements have discouraged South Carolinians from enjoying the open waters. This bill ensures boaters and anglers can afford the equipment made in our state that they need to make the most of our beautiful waterways”

Boat owners in South Carolina faces some of the highest property taxes in America, more than 320% higher than our bordering neighbors in some places. It’s forcing families to get rid of their boats and spend less time enjoying South Carolina’s great outdoors. A sentiment that even the governor has chimed in on in support of the bill.

“S.C. boat owners pay the highest property taxes in America. We have a chance to change that,” Governor Henry McMaster wrote on social media. “I support cutting boat and motor property taxes so working families can keep enjoying our state’s beautiful waters.”

In one comparison a $50,000 boat brings a personal property tax bill of $2,800 a year in some parts of South Carolina. The same boat, across Lake Wylie, in North Carolina has a tax bill of $378 a year.

If a family uses their pontoon boat for just five outings a summer, they’re effectively paying $560 per trip to the government in taxes.

House Minority Leader Todd Rutherford, D-Richland, a vocal supporter of the bill, is past ready to get this bill through and bring relief to middle class boating families.

“This bill is about fairness and freedom. Boating should be about family time, not financial penalties,” Rutherford said. “For too long, the middle class has carried the burden while high-end boats just get registered out of state. That ends now.”

The South Carolina Boating and Fishing Alliance, a consumer advocacy group aimed at uniting the voices of boating and fishing enthusiasts in the state are big supporters of the bills, conducted a survey that suggests nearly 80 percent of boats sold to South Carolina residents with a sale price of more than $120,000 are being registered out of state. They say this bill would not only cut tax rates on boats, it brings revenue back from these out-of-state registered boats and would also streamline the boat buying process for new boat purchases in the state.

“When we make it more affordable to own and register boats in South Carolina, we’re opening the door for more boaters to call our state home. This isn’t just good for taxpaying citizens of South Carolina, it’s good for our marine industry, creating jobs and boosting local businesses that serve boaters and anglers,” said Gettys Brannon, SCBFA President and CEO. “Basic economics suggest, anytime the cost of a product decreases, there should be an increase in demand. During this debate, many have forgotten that principle.”

Rutherford, who co-sponsored H.3858, also agrees.

“South Carolina is pricing itself out of boat ownership. Citizens buy their boats here and register them elsewhere,” Rutherford said. “This bill will open the door for more boaters to call our state home and create a ripple effect that benefits not just individuals, but our entire boating and fishing economy and small businesses across the state.”

Opponents to the bill, like the South Carolina Association of Counties, argue that boating is a luxury and shouldn't get a tax cut. They believe this will shift the tax burden to small businesses or renters, affecting funds for essential services like schools, law enforcement, and fire protection.  

“As more people are coming to South Carolina, this bill is asking counties, cities, and school districts to lose a significant amount of revenue and have small business and renters subsidize those who have the luxury of having a boat,” said Owen McBride, SSAC. “In all reality, this increase is going to go on the backs of small businesses and renters.”

Other counties claim the if lawmakers pass these tax cuts they’ll lose millions of dollars in revenue yearly. Charleston County taking one of the biggest losses.

“The amount of revenue that watercraft brings in in Charleston is around $19 million,” said Peter Tecklenburg, Charleston County Auditor. “This would be a tax shift. We would have to find a way to make up this revenue.”

Brewer, who represents the Charleston County area, argues these are not luxury boats
and the counties need to learn to budget, live within in their means.

“The majority of people that own boats in my area, that own boats in general, are not using these boats as a luxury items like the counties like to try and tell you they are. They’re using these boats to be able to spend time with their families. These are their vacation time. These are the weekends with their kids. This is the time they get to spend with their family and yet we decide to tax them at 10 and a half percent,” Brewer said. “you’re [The counties are] living outside of your means and at the end of the day this is the tax payers money. It’s not their money.”

Brewer also says it’s basic economics.

“The counties will say this takes away money form schools, but what they don’t understand is if we’re selling more boats, we’re producing more boats,” Brewer said. “That means the manufacturers have to add on to what they got which means the money they invest back into manufacturing, that goes to schools.”

According to numbers from the National Marine Manufacturing Association, South Carolina ranks 13th in the nation for recreational boating economic impact. Recreational boating has more than a 6.5 billion annual impact and supports 27,000 jobs in the state. Brannon also believes that economic impact can work in the counties favor with tax revenues.

“This proposal affects less than one percent of most county budgets—budgets that continue to grow organically year after year. At the same time, high taxes are driving boats and their associated revenue out of state,” Brannon said. “By making boat ownership more affordable we can grow the base, recapture lost registration and support long-term funding stability-not threaten it.”

One resident, who testified at the state house said, he’s been “paying and paying” and just looking for some “tax relief” for “a little guy in the pond” that just likes to take his grandkids out on the lake and fish.

“I have two boats. I have a jon boat. I don’t have big boats. I don’t have a 100,000 dollar boat or anything—I got a nice little twenty-one-foot bass boat. I like to crappy fish out of. I got a John boat like to take to Sante in the rivers. Nothing terribly expenses,” Eddie Taylor, retired resident, Gilbert, S.C., testified to lawmakers at the state house. “All of them are ten to 15 years old, but I am still paying two to three thousand dollars in personal property taxes for these boats. I pay more personal property taxes on these boats than I do on my nice brick home and my 56 acres of land.”

Brannon tells us this is what this tax cut is really about, a way of life, not luxury yachts.

“This isn’t about yachts and millionaires. It’s about the family with a John boat, weekend fishermen, pontoon boat owners, grandfathers taking their grandkids out fishing,” Brannon said. “Boating is a way of life in South Carolina—but the current tax structure is holding people back. No one should feel punished for wanting to spend time on our lakes, rivers, and coastlines. This is our chance to make boating more affordable, keep more boats registered in state, and invite more families into the outdoors.”

House Bill 3858 cleared another hurdle this morning. The Full Ways & Means committee advanced the bill with a vote of 17-5.

“We are cautiously optimistic. With over 50 legislators supporting meaningful relief for the highest boat property taxes in the nation, there’s grassroots momentum behind the effort,” Brannon said. “As a group fighting for boat owners and anglers across South Carolina, we certainly hope to see it passed this session, but ultimately, that decision rests with our elected lawmakers.”

The legislative session ends May 8.

About the Author:

Tony Spain is a former candidate for Richland County Council 2020 and an award winning former military photographer and journalist while in the Public Affairs Office for the U.S. Army. His photos and writing have been published in numerous publications such as The Commercial News, Danville, Ill.; The Paraglide, Fort Bragg, N.C.; Soldier of Fortune Magazine; The State Newspaper, Columbia, S.C., and more.

He lives in Columbia, S.C.

 

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com 

Friday, April 18, 2025

Updated: One student dead, at least 21 injured in tragic school bus crash on I-77 in Chester County

 

Written by: Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner
April 18, 2025

COLUMBIA, S.C. (PE)— South Carolina Highway Patrol has confirmed a 13-year-old student was killed and at least 21 other people were injured when a Lexington County school bus returning from a field trip blew a tire, hit a guard rail and overturned at mile marker 55 on I-77 near Richburg in Chester County Thursday afternoon.

Lexington School District Two officials have confirmed there were three buses with students from Pine Ridge Middle School returning from a field trip in Charlotte, N.C. when a bus carrying 35 students from Pine Ridge Middle School and three adults had an accident.

One of the other buses used evasive measures to avoid colliding with the overturned bus. Some students on that bus were treated for injuries, but it’s unclear the severity of those injuries at this time.  

Local elected officials have given comments and statements of prayer and condolences.

“Our hearts are broken by the tragic bus accident in Chester County this afternoon. Our entire state is mourning alongside the Pine Ridge Middle School families, friends, classmates, and educators,” S.C. Superintendent of Education, Ellen Weaver said in a statement. “Please join me in praying for the Lexington Two community.”

“Today’s school bus accident in Chester County is a tragedy no family should ever have to endure,” said Governor Henry McMaster. “Peggy and I are heartbroken. Please join us in praying for the victims, their family, a speedy recovery for those injured, and the entire Lexington Two community. All of South Carolina is with you.”

“Devastated to hear about the school bus crash in Chester County,” S.C. Attorney General, Alan Wilson, Lexington County resident, said. “My heart goes out to the students, families, and the entire Pine Ridge Middle School community. South Carolina is praying for you.”

“Our Pine Ridge Middle School family experienced a tragedy today. Families in our community are hurting and there are no words that will be able to ease the pain,” said State Sen. Russell Ott, (D) District 26, said. The middle school is in the district he represents.

“I want to thank first responders at the scene and everyone who came together to ensure parents could be unified with their children quickly and safely. As we continue to sort through the details of the accident, be assured all involved are working to make sure every resource is available to those affected,” added Ott.

First responders and local law enforcement from dozens of agencies arrived on the scene shutting down I-77 in both directions as ambulances and helicopters helped transport those with serious injuries to nearby hospitals. I-77 southbound lanes were closed for six hours after the crash.

The school district set up a “reunification site” for students' families six miles south of the crash site. Passengers on all three buses were cleared by EMS after a medical evaluation and taken to the reunification site for pick up according to the school district.

Pine Ridge Middle School started spring break on Friday, but early Friday morning at 7 a.m., the Pine Ridge Middle School community gathered around the flag poles at the school for a prayer vigil.

“Even at this most painful time, it is a source of comfort to know that we live in a community and state where people look out for each other,” said Lexington Two Superintendent Brenda Hafner, expressing gratitude for the outpouring of support.

Counseling services were also made available at the school Friday morning, and a letter to parents from the district said additional support services will also be available when students return from spring break April 28.  

Pine Ridge Middle School has set up a donation page for those who’d like to give help to the families of those still in the hospital. You can find those resources on their website.

The accident remains under investigation by the South Carolina Highway Patrol.

**********

About the Author: 


Tony Spain is a former candidate for Richland County Council 2020 and an award winning former military photographer and journalist while in the Public Affairs Office for the U.S. Army. His photos and writing have been published in numerous publications such as The Commercial News, Danville, Ill.; The Paraglide, Fort Bragg, N.C.; Soldier of Fortune Magazine; The State Newspaper, Columbia, S.C., and more.

He lives in Columbia, S.C.

 

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com


Monday, April 7, 2025

Op Ed Guest Columnist: Leaders in Columbia Shouldn’t Let Bad Actors Pass the Buck to Others; Protect Our Children from Inappropriate Online Content


Written by: Tracy Robins, Richland County
April 1, 2025


Throughout 2024, numerous reports exposed the secretive tactics used by social media giants like Facebook and TikTok to profit from children. This includes shady data collection practices, targeted advertising to minors, and algorithms designed to serve dangerous and addictive content to children. These reports have sparked an outcry among parents, including families here in South Carolina, for our elected officials to do something to stop bad actors from exploiting children and teenagers online.

In response to these growing concerns, lawmakers around the country have fought to rein in dangerous social media companies. This includes Governor McMaster’s decision to ban TikTok on state government devices. Additionally, Attorney General Alan Wilson has joined dozens of state attorneys general to sue Facebook for intentionally harming its young users. In the past, TikTok and Facebook have fought fiercely against regulations and lawsuits like these. However, it’s become impossible for social media companies to deny the harmful effects of their platforms.

Now, in the face of mounting pressure, Facebook has changed its tune, and the company claims it wants elected officials to pass social media regulations, but as always, the devil is in the details.

Facebook’s plan is to get lawmakers to regulate other companies so that social media platforms like TikTok and Facebook aren’t held responsible for intentionally designing addictive and harmful apps. Of course, there are some serious issues with Facebook’s plans. The Supreme Court has already overturned similar proposals, meaning taxpayer dollars will be spent defending Facebook-backed legislation instead of protecting our children. What’s worse is that the regulations Facebook supports wouldn’t even work. They include loopholes that would allow children to continue to access their platforms and would even force other businesses to hand private data over to social media companies, making it easier for bad actors like Facebook and TikTok to profit off their users’ sensitive information.

Facebook’s proposal has earned the support of other companies with a track record of unsavory business practices who have realized they could benefit by passing off the responsibility for their own problems. Match Group, for example, which owns many of the largest data apps on the market like Hinge and Tinder, has thrown its support behind the measure. Match, of course, sees the bill as a ticket to make someone else accountable for keeping underage users off of its apps, an issue the company has failed to address for years.

Pornography websites have even realized that these kinds of bills could benefit them. Companies that produce and promote explicit content have indicated their support for similar so-called “device filter” legislation that includes loopholes that would allow them to show inappropriate content to underage children and teens on their laptops, desktops, and some other devices without facing any accountability. 

However, lawmakers should not listen to social media giants, dating apps, or pornography companies about which online regulations will best protect young South Carolinians. Instead, they should listen to the parents of children who are affected by dangerous content online. New polling shows that 87% of parents support regulations to safeguard children’s mental health and shield them from inappropriate content online. The same study found that 93% of parents want content providers, including social media companies, video game makers, and pornography websites, to play a role in protecting kids from dangerous content on the internet.

In other words, parents know that the best way to keep children safe online is to hold actors accountable, and they’re right. Companies like Facebook have responded to recent pressure from lawmakers to make the apps they own safer. In fact, the company recently adopted technology to verify users’ ages and keep children away from Instagram, which is owned by Facebook. In Columbia, state legislators should do the same and put pressure on Facebook and other bad actors to take similar actions that would keep young users off of their dangerous apps.

The fact is that dangerous apps are harmful to our children, and for far too long, these bad actors have avoided accountability for their actions. Lawmakers shouldn’t let them avoid responsibility again by falling for a transparent effort to put the onus on others.

**********

About the Author:

Tracy Robins lives in Columbia and is a retired public-school teacher. She currently serves as the Richland County Republican Party’s Election Committee Chairwoman.


What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com



Friday, April 4, 2025

Gov. McMaster doubles-down on Simmer Nomination to lead SC Dept. of Public Health; Asks Senate for full floor vote after contentious confirmation hearing, 12-5 vote not to confirm

 

Sen. Matt Leber, R-Charleston, (Right) asks Dr. Edward Simmer questions during his Senate
confirmation hearing Thursday. The Senate Medical Affairs Committee voted 12-5 not to confirm.

Written by Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner
April 4, 2025

The Senate Medical Affairs Committee voted 12-5 against the confirmation of Dr. Edward Simmer, the governor’s pick, to run the S.C. Department of Public Health yesterday after a contentious hearing that centered around decisions made during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The second day of Simmer’s confirmation hearing drew a large crowd not in support of his nomination, and Sen. Danny Verdin, R-Laurens, Committee Chairman, had to call for decorum twice before warning the audience he would clear the room.  

The no vote puts Simmer’s nomination on pause in committee indefinitely, but it doesn’t automatically kill the nomination. The full Senate could still decide to take up his confirmation with a vote on the floor, which Gov. Henry McMaster, who seems to be doubling down on Simmer, is strongly encouraging them to do.

“I remain resolute in my support of Dr. Simmer and am hopeful that the full senate will see through the falsehoods and mistruths being spread about his service to our state and nation,” McMaster said in a statement on social media soon after the committee’s vote.

If the Senate does decide to give McMaster his wish of a full vote on the Senate floor for confirmation, the odds seemed to be stacked against Simmer with a Republican supermajority. Sen. Tom Davis, R-Beaufort, was the only one of the 13 Republicans on the committee who voted in favor of his confirmation yesterday.

“There’s just no way I can sugar coat it,” said Sen. Harvey Peeler, R-Gaffney. “I’m not telling you something you don’t already know. Your confirmation is facing an uphill battle.”

Simmer was drilled by Republicans on his response, quotes and decisions made during the COVID-19 pandemic, and admitted himself he would have made some decisions differently with the information he has today.

“Knowing what I know today, yes, I would have approached that differently,” Simmer said speaking about recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for young people. “I would not have encouraged the vaccine as strongly.”

Simmer mentioned throughout the hearing him and his office “worked with the information they had at the time.”

One Senator told Simmer we had the best information you can have at any time during an emergency.

“What I’ve heard from yourself, it’s not a critique, but also from many other people who made many mistakes during COVID. They’re all saying the same thing now. We didn’t have all the information,” said Sen. Tom Fernadez, R-Berkley. “Here’s what we did have. We had the United States Constitution. We had personal liberty. We had personal freedom. That’s the best information at any time in any emergency.”

Sen. Matt Leber, R-Charleston, also hit Simmer hard during question stating he has lost confidence in Simmer’s leadership.

“I’m not confident,” Leber said. “I think about the sheriff’s and the teachers and nurses in Charleston County that lost their job because they were told you take the vaccine or your out.”

Simmer said he didn’t agree with that and didn’t think that was a good idea, but when Leber asked, “Did you speak up?” Simmer replied he didn’t because he didn’t think it was his place to speak up.

“I’m asking you to speak up as our expert on health,” Leber said. “Did you speak up as our South Carolina expert on health on something you fully admit that you felt was unnecessary or good for society?”

Simmer released a statement after the hearing thanking the members of the committee and especially Chairman Sen. Denny Verdin for providing him the opportunity to answer, “any and all questions about my nomination in an honorable and respectable format.”

“I also appreciate the continued support of Gov. Henry McMaster for my leadership of the S.C. Department of Public Health,” Simmer noted.

Simmer will remain as the interim director for now.


**********
About the Author:

Tony Spain writes for his own website, Palmetto Examiner. He is a former candidate for Richland County Council 2020 and an award winning former military photographer and journalist while in the Public Affairs Office for the U.S. Army. His photos and writing have been published in numerous publications such as The Commercial News, Danville, Ill.; The Paraglide, Fort Bragg, N.C.; Soldier of Fortune Magazine; The State Newspaper, Columbia, S.C., and more. He currently writes for his own website, Palmetto Examiner

He lives in Columbia, S.C.

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com


Wednesday, March 26, 2025

OPINION: Governor McMaster Should Seek a Second Opinion on Head of Department of Public Health

 




Written by Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner
March 26, 2025

 
The practice of medicine often involves a mix of science, experience, and judgement and second opinions can play a big role in refining that process. Doctors rely on established theories—like how diseases work, how drugs or vaccines interact, how things like masks, quarantines and social distancing prevents the spread —grounded in evidence from studies and trials. But medicine isn’t just plugging symptoms into a formula: it’s about interpreting those theories in the messy reality of the situation you find yourself in, and sometimes the experts can disagree.

And let me say, I’m not a doctor, never played one on tv, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express and have gotten a second opinion in the past that was a much better outcome than what was originally recommended.

Sometimes a second opinion is smart. A second opinion is essentially a check on the first doctor’s reasoning. No one is infallible. Studies show misdiagnosis rates can range from 5 percent to 20 percent, depending on the condition. Different doctors might weigh the same evidence differently or spot something the other missed. It’s not necessarily the science changes; it’s the application of it can vary.

South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster seems unwilling to look at a second opinion when it comes to Dr. Edward Simmer, Interim Head of South Carolina Department of Public Health and his nominee for the first South Carolina Department of Public Health. McMaster continues to stand solidly behind his decision calling Simmer “exceptional” and “eminently qualified,” but many in his own party are not in agreement. They label Simmer as “South Carolina’s Dr. Fauci” and an opponent to “medical freedom.” Those complaints have centered around the State’s response to COVID-19. Opponents claim Simmer pushed for school closures, shutdowns and vaccine and mask mandates.

“Dr. Edward Simmer’s track record during the pandemic demonstrated a clear disregard for South Carolinian’s values and freedoms, prioritizing mandates and divisive policies over individual rights,” Sen. Tom Fernandez, a Summerville Republican who sits on the committee, wrote on Facebook in a post Simmer specifically addressed in his Senate Medical Affairs Committee Confirmation Hearing Thursday claiming it to be “absolutely false.”

McMaster says he has heard the critics but doesn’t understand them, claiming no one is more qualified for the position in the state.

“I’ve been listening closely to the things the critics have been saying about him so far in the last few days, and I have not found an ounce of truth in any of it. I have not found a word of truth about the allegations they’re making against the man. He wasn’t even here when all those mandates were going on,” McMaster said in January when criticism was mounting. “He wasn’t even here. He arrived after all the federal mandates and all that, all of which we challenge in court and all of which we won,” McMaster said. “I do not know if we could find anyone as good as, much less better than, Dr. Simmer, so I think those that are criticizing him ought to take a good look at the facts and then decide what they want to say.”

And that is exactly the goal here is to take a good look at the facts before deciding what to say.

Simmer was appointed by McMaster to take over the lead of Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) in February 2021 before the agency was dissolved into separate departments and has been the interim head of the newly created South Carolina Department of Public Health since November 2021 and it is true, most of the mandates had ended by then. Simmer claims even if he had been in the state when the pandemic began in 2020, he wouldn’t have recommended closing schools or businesses.

“Let me be perfectly clear, so that everyone on this committee and every citizen of this state can hear it directly from me. I have never prioritized any mandates,” Simmer said during testimony. “I will continue to preserve and defend South Carolinians’ freedom and individual rights.”

Simmer likes to continuously point out that he hasn’t required or supports mandating the COVID vaccine to anyone. And technically he is right, but he has recommended and ran a $5 million public relations campaign to manipulate information and push the vaccine through peer pressure tactics to get as many people as possible to get the vaccine.

In more than 25 hours of 2021 DHEC board meetings led by Simmer and condensed into about a 30-minute highlight reel, compiled by Palmetto State Watch, Simmer talks about giving “free admission to state parks during holiday weekends” to anyone getting the COVID vaccine on site, mobile units going into communities “street by street getting people to vaccinate right where they are” stating the “goal is to get as many people vaccines as we can.”

In June 2021, Simmer also talks about a “shot and chaser” campaign with local breweries to target 21–26-year-olds, the lowest group of unvaccinated people.

“We are really trying to get younger people vaccinated. We think this is a good way to reach out to some of those folks,” Simmer says. “When we can find things where people are going out with friends, and friends say, hey, let’s go get vaccinated. Those kinds of things have shown in the past to be highly effective.”

Yes, peer pressure is highly persuasive. It’s how many young people end up with tattoos they later regret or a drug habit pushed by a drug dealer that also uses peer pressure. It’s highly manipulative.  

This is not a suggestion that Dr. Simmer is nefariously pushing a vaccine to “hurt children” or “put poison in people’s arms” as some of his critics have suggested. I think Dr. Simmer believes in the effectiveness of the vaccine as he has gotten the vaccine himself.

I also believe some criticism of Simmer is unwarranted and unfounded as McMaster says, but not all of it.

In August 2021, Simmer is on video during a board meeting, requiring masks for schools despite not having the legal authority.

“The best way to protect our children is to require the use of masks by everyone in the school. Whether or not our schools are allowed to do that I think is a question that is an open one. I know there may be a legal case regarding that. I’m certainly not an expert in the area and can’t comment on that part,” he said in the video. “I think we know from the public health standpoint and what the science shows that if we want to protect our students…and keep them in school we should require masking.”

That seems to be in contradiction to “never requiring mask mandates.”

It also seems clear, that if not for the state legislature banning mask and vaccine mandates, Dr. Simmer would have not hesitated to require vaccine and mask mandates for everybody.

Simmer also likes to tote the line that at the Department of Public Health, “we inform, and you decide,” but it also seems not all the information is being provided. Only the information that aligns with certain beliefs while other information from other groups of doctors is discredited and labeled misinformation.

At the same time, I won’t go as far as other critics who say Dr. Simmer has contradicted himself on several occasions. I can understand the information provided to him can change, especially through an ongoing pandemic.

The practice of medicine is science based. Science is based in theory, which is why you have second opinions and doctors can agree or disagree on best treatments. I’d prefer the option of someone that presents all the information available, not just the cherry-picked information that aligns with certain beliefs and recommendations.

After a hard look at the facts, Governor McMaster should seek a second opinion on who should be the Head of South Carolina Department of Public Health. I think he will find we can do better. South Carolina definitely deserves better.

**********
About the Author: Tony Spain is a former candidate for Richland County Council 2020 and an award winning former military photographer and journalist while in the Public Affairs Office for the U.S. Army. His photos and writing have been published in numerous publications such as The Commercial News, Danville, Ill.; The Paraglide, Fort Bragg, N.C.; Soldier of Fortune Magazine; The State Newspaper, Columbia, S.C., and more.

He lives in Columbia, S.C.

What Say You? Got something you'd like to say? Letter to the Editor (Guest Column), praises, criticism, hate mail, news story tip or just want to say, howdy. Send them to Tony@palmettoexaminer.com

Born Slave, Union War Hero, Founder of the SC Republican Party, Congressman: The Robert Smalls Story

Written by Tony J. Spain, Palmetto Examiner February 18, 2026 Robert Smalls was a warrior, but not by sword or rifle on an open battlefield,...